Friday, April 30, 2010

Wood for Great Violins


The latest book I have been reading is Barron's Pocket Factbook of Natural History. Among the many intriguing facts now in my pocket is that the secret of the superior sound of Stradivarius violins may be that they were made from trees growing during the Little Ice Age.

The Little Ice Age lasted from about the 15th century to the 19th century. Within this period there were three distinct low points. Antonio Stradivari was born just before the beginning of the lowest low point (the "Maunder Minimum"), which lasted from about 1645 to 1715. Therefore, the wood he used for his violins came from trees growing during the Little Ice Age, and especially during the Maunder Minimum.

It is well known that wood growing during colder weather is denser than wood growing during warmer weather. The wider, lighter colored rings of a tree are created during the growing season, and are more porous (less dense) because they are transporting water. If the growing season is colder, the tree will grow less, these rings will be narrower, and the tree overall will be more dense. There will also be less variation in density throughout the wood, since the lighter rings will be closer in density to the darker rings.

It is believed that (among many other factors), wood with a more uniform density makes a better sounding violin. Since the trees growing during the Maunder Minimum would have the most uniform density in recent history, Stradivari and his contemporaries had a natural advantage over modern luthiers (violin makers).

I should note that the superiority of Stradivarius violins is controversial. Many blind tests have been conducted over the years, with experts unable to distinguish between a Stradivarius and other high quality violins. In one interesting test, the clear winner was a modern violin in which the wood had been treated with fungus.

Spruce treated with the fungus Physiporinus vitrius was used for the front of this violin, and sycamore treated with with Xylaria longipes was used for the back. These fungi are known for breaking down the cell walls within the wood, but leaving the structural compounds between the cells intact. This makes the wood less dense but just as strong. Because of the way these particular fungi selectively break down the wood, they decrease the variation in its density. This is a different means to the same end, of making the wood more uniform.

Other methods have been tried over the years for making the density of wood more uniform, although it is not believed that Stradivari used these methods. They include soaking the wood in water ("ponding") and boiling it ("stewing"). Ponding may inadvertently use microorganisms in the pond that work in a similar manner to the fungi described above. The common practice of air drying wood before using it also increases its uniformity.

After all is said and done, there is one thing everyone can agree on - the beautiful music created by the violinist would not be possible without the beautiful, majestic trees.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Climate Prediction at Home

Last week I wrote about how I signed up for three "distributed computing" projects, including one that tests climate change prediction models. I thought I would check in to see what my computer has been doing in its spare time to help save the world.

The screen shot above shows what my climate model was doing tonight. It is showing what the model would have predicted worldwide temperatures to be at 3:00 PM GMT (10 AM EST) on April 26, 1812. It shows about 12 degrees C (55 degrees F) where I am in New Jersey. That's right about what the temperature has been this week in NJ, 198 years to the week after the date of this model. So far so good.

The idea of this distributed computing project is to run hundreds of thousands of climate simulations using slightly different values for the many variables involved. The simulations begin in 1810 and go to 2050. The simulation shown above took 9 hours to go through 2 years (1810 to 1812). Those climate models that can accurately model the past get the Citizen Scientist Seal of Approval for use in predicting the future.

For a more in-depth discussion of this project, or to sign up your computer, you can visit ClimatePrediction.net.

This site gave me chilling flashbacks to a computer modeling project I worked on for my undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering. All we were asked to model was a magnetic stirrer, the kind used in laboratories to stir beakers of liquid. The magnet inside the stirrer spins at a uniform rotational velocity around a fixed axis, but the magnet inside the beaker does not. The magnet in the beaker is slowed by the drag of the liquid, and its axis moves with the tangential forces. Your grade depended on how many of the possible variables your model considered.

We spent many hours in the basement of the Computer Center (this was before PCs) trying to model a process that I'm sure is much simpler than the global climate. We were using Fortran, which I was surprised to find out is not only still in use, but is the preferred programming language for computational modeling.

I am very glad to be able to lend my spare computing power to solving some very tough problems. Just don't ask me to write the code.

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Great Falls Challenge


I had some spare time on a business trip to Virginia last week, so I scanned the map for something worth visiting.

I was only a few miles from something billed as the "Great Falls of the Potomac River". I am well acquainted with the Great Falls of the Passaic River (aka the Great Falls of Paterson NJ). This seemed like a direct challenge from the Great Commonwealth of Virginia to the Great State of New Jersey regarding who possessed the greatest waterfall. I rushed to the scene to investigate.

As you can see from the photo above, the "Great Falls of the Potomac River" should be renamed the "Great Rapids of the Potomac River". But they were pretty impressive rapids, and it was a beautiful day, so I pressed on.

Downstream of the rapids, I found 3 kayakers surfing the standing waves. That qualified as great.

A little further downstream, I came across a "Great" Blue Heron. (No kidding. He obviously wanted to be in the company of other great things.)

Further downstream, the river cuts a deep and narrow gorge into the rock. Above the falls the river is 1000 feet wide, and below the falls it narrows to as little as 60 feet wide. This causes frequent and dramatic flooding when the gorge gets backed up with water. Unfortunately I missed one of these great events by only a month.

Running along the river from above the falls to below the gorge are the remnants of a canal, and a small town whose residents built and operated the canal. The Patowmack Canal was the brainchild of George Washington (a great President but not a great speller). My guess is that Washington threw his silver dollar across the Potomac at the Potomac Gorge, not in his namesake town where the river is much wider.

So what's the verdict? Which falls are greater? As a New Jersey native, I definitely vote for the Great Falls of Paterson. Below is a photo for your review, taken on a very cold winter day.

You might be curious to know that the Great Falls of Paterson fall 77 feet in one shot, as opposed to the Great Falls of the Potomac, which "fall" a measly 76 feet over a length of almost a mile. Their largest single drop is only about 20 feet. In the "famous founding father" department, the Great Falls of Paterson were industrialized by Alexander Hamilton, first Secretary of the Treasury under George Washington.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Searching for Aliens


Wow, it has been a LONNNG time since I have posted on my blog. I have been busy with many distractions, including my taxes (see the photo above). I have also been reading Carl Sagan's book The Varieties of Scientific Experience. Coincidentally, both of these distractions involved aliens.

If you are familiar with Carl Sagan, you know he was passionate about the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI). This book recommends participating in the SETI@home project, which uses the spare processing power of over 5 million personal computers around the world. The project is coordinated by UC Berkeley.

Data from the Arecibo radio telescope in Puerto Rico are downloaded to your computer, in chunks of about 107 seconds of observation at a time. Your computer then performs over 2 trillion mathematical operations on this 107 seconds of data to filter out signals that might be evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence. The findings get reported to UC Berkeley, and they send you more data to analyze. If your computer is the one that finds ET, you get named as a co-discoverer.

Who wouldn't jump at that opportunity for fame and fortune? Of course I signed up. And if the KindOfCurious laptop is the one that finds ET, my readers will be the first to know. No need to endlessly monitor the "mainstream" news channels for word of mankind's first contact with another world. Just keep reading KindOfCurious!

If you too would like to donate your spare computing power to the search for extraterrestrials, check out the SETI at Home website.

The software that allows you to download SETI@home also lets you participate in other "distributed computing" projects, from deciphering a Nazi message intercepted during WWII and still unbroken, to helping to cure cancer. I also signed up for a project to test climate change prediction models, and one that supports various (mostly medical) research. I'll post more about those in the future.